Tuesday, January 06, 2009

 

Unprecedented Numbers of Americans Question Israel's Actions in Gaza - By Max Blumenthal, Huffington Post

Add to Technorati Favorites

http://www.alternet.org/audits/117568/?page=entire
 

Unprecedented Numbers of Americans Question Israel's Actions in Gaza

By Max BlumenthalHuffington Post. Posted January 6, 2009.


Could it be the rise of online progressive media telling the truth about Israel, or that the public rejects the same pundits who sold us Iraq?

Also in ForeignPolicy

Click here to find out more!

Almost as soon as the first Israeli missile struck the Gaza Strip, a veteran cheering squad suited up to support the home team. "Israel is so scrupulous about civilian life," Charles Krauthammer claimed in the Washington Post. Echoing Krauthammer, Alan Dershowitz called the Israeli attack on Gaza, "Perfectly 'Proportionate.'" And in the New York Times, Israeli historian Benny Morris described his country's airstrikes as "highly efficient."

While the cheerleaders testified to the superior moral fiber of their team, the Palestinian civilian death toll mounted. Israeli missiles tore at least fifteen Palestinian police cadets to shreds at a graduation ceremony, blew twelve worshipers to pieces (including six children) while they left evening prayers at a mosque, flattened the elite American International School, killed five sisters while they slept in their beds, and liquidated 9 women and children in order to kill a single Hamas leader. So far, Israeli forces have killed at least  500 Gazans and wounded some two thousand, including hundreds of children. Yesterday, the IDF blanketed parts of Gaza with white phosphorus, a chemical weapon Saddam Hussein once deployed against Kurdish rebels.

"It was Israel at its best," Yossi Klein Halevi declared in the New Republic.

By New Year's Day, Israel's cheering squad had turned the opinion pages of major American newspapers into their own personal romper room. Of all the editorial contributions published by the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, and the New York Times since the Israel's war on Gaza began, to my knowledge only one offered a skeptical view of the assault. But that editorial, by Israeli novelist David Grossman, contained not a single word about the Palestinian casualties of IDF attacks. Even while calling for a cease fire, Grossman promised, "We can always start shooting again."

Israeli public relations agents fanned out to broadcast studios from the US to Europe, fulfilling an aggressive strategy conceived after the country's catastrophic 2006 attack on Lebanon. An analysis by Israel's foreign ministry of eight hours of coverage across international broadcast media concluded that Israeli representatives received a whopping 58 minutes of airtime compared to only 19 minutes for Palestinians. "Quite a few outlets are very favorable to Israel, namely by showing [its] suffering. I am sure it is a result of the new co-ordination," said Major Avital Leibovich, an IDF spokesperson who has become a fixture on cable news in the past weeks.

But while Israel's PR machine cranked its Mighty Wurlitzer to full blast, drowning out all opposing voices with its droning sound, a surprisingly substantial portion of the American public decided to dance to its own tune. According to a December 31 Rasmussen poll (so far the only measure of US opinion on the Gaza assault), while Americans remained overwhelmingly supportive of Israel, they were split almost evenly on the question of whether Israel should attack Gaza -- 44% in favor of the assault and 41% against it. The internals are even more remarkable.

While Republicans supported the assault on Gaza by a large margin, a predictable finding, only 31% of Democrats did. Members of the Democratic base thus stood in sharp contrast to most of their elected representatives (freshman Rep. Donna Edwards is a notable exception), who backed the latest Israeli assault in lockstep, and seem to support Israel no matter what it does. The rift between the progressive base and the party played out on Barack Obama's Change.gov site, which was deluged in recent days with demands for a statement condemning Israel's assault on Gaza.

So what accounts for the surprising trend in American opinion on Gaza? The proliferation of progressive online media and social networking sites could be a factor, but I have another theory: The same pundits who are cheerleading Israel's assault on Gaza once sold the occupation of Iraq to America, and with a nearly identical set of arguments. In their voices and those of the grim Israeli PR agents carted out for cable news, many Americans hear echoes of the Bush administration's most fantastical lies. When they see images of Gazans under withering bombardment, they flash back to Fallujah and the assorted horrors of Iraq. When they look at Israel, they see themselves during the darkest days of the Bush era.

Now, an increasing share of Americans know what Israel is doing to Gaza. And they reject it, even when Israel is "at its best."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: israelgazawhite phosphorous

Max Blumenthal is a Puffin Foundation writing fellow at the Nation Institute based in Washington, DC. Read his blog at maxblumenthal.blogspot.com.


 

THE POWER OF INDIA'S URDU PRESS - By Ghulam Muhammed

Add to Technorati Favorites

THE POWER OF INDIA'S URDU PRESS

It started with M. J. Akbar writing his Sunday sermon in the Times of India. While branding Union Minister for Minority Affair, A. R. Antulay, the Simi Garewal of Indian politics, he made a side-swipe on Urdu press, for taking up the cue from Antulay and persisting on spreading the conspiracy theory, that ATS Karkare's death was too convenient for Hindutva Parivar to be brushed aside as an act of foreign terrorists. Since the day, Karkare started bringing in names of Sangh Parivar protagonists like Sadhvi and Purohit, BJP's top leaders were calling for his head. Advani did not miss a day not making headline news about his extreme displeasure with Karkare bent on exposing "Hindu terrorists". Poor chap was heading towards wherever the evidence was leading him. That was not the done thing for the political parties run by High Caste oligarchy. They wanted all such evidence to be covered up, just like former ATS Chief Raghuvanshi had buried the Nanded blast incident, in which RSS members were killed and injured while making bombs. Does not Akbar give any importance to the fact that Karkare's widow turned down Narendera Modi's and now openly questioning Sangh Parivar, why they become so silent now ---- now that Karkare is dead.


It is still an enigma, why M. J. Akbar should be so interested that any mention of Karkare and his convenient death should be treated as a 'negative' investigative journalism and he felt that Urdu Press is guilty as charged. For that indiscretion of his, I called him the Simi Garewal of Indian Journalism. The debate about Urdu journalism restarted in cyberspace and an NRI group had a very robust discussion on all aspect of Urdu journalism, though it remained confined to a select circle of friends and mainstream Urdu media did not pick up M. J. Akbar's swipe.

M. J. Akbar, probably incensed by the criticism of his stand against Urdu Press, next week found another topic which he thought should have been taken up by the Urdu Press. Times of India's sister publication, Mumbai Mirror published a table showing how Maharashtra's government under the Chief Ministership of Vilasrao Deshmukh, had underperformed and was not able to spend even budgeted amounts in the fiscal year that will be ending next March. In that table, an item of Rs. 167 Crore was shown earmarked for Minority welfare. The punch-line was that not a single rupee from this budgeted amount was spent for the welfare of the Minority community. M. J. Akbar took that up and exhorted Urdu Press that rather than pressing on untenable conspiracy theories, they should have highlighted the utter neglect of the Vilasrao Deshmukh government.

M. J. Akbar's suggestion was taken up in right spirit by Inquilab, Mumbai, which highlighted Vilasrao Deshmukh utter neglect of the community, while his party, The Indian National Congress, presided over by Sonia Gandhi, has been bending over backwards, in trying to spread the fiction that Muslims have been the most preferred voter group by her party.

In this connection, when Inquilab's correspondents, Mubashir Mushtaq and Mukhtar Adeel, questioned State Minister for minority affair, Haji Anees Ahmed, he was enraged and publicly blurted --- 'shut up' to the two press persons. Inquilab headlined the encounter on its front pages and it was this campaign that forced the Haji Anees Ahmed to call on Inquilab office in the dead of night, to offer his apologies for his unparliamentarily outburst. He further made out that since he has taken charge only a fortnight back, he will see to it that the budgeted amount is fully utilized for minority welfare.

Inquilab's next day front page headline reported how the cabinet meeting was completely silent on the issue of Minority Fund. Inquilab further reported in detail about the how the Principal Secretary for Minority affairs, F. T. Thakekara, put the blame on the Government, which has failed to come out with any scheme for minority welfare.

In another development, Urdu Times commentator, Farooq Ansari, wrote a Special Report on how Muslims are discriminated against when, even in budget, their puny allotment of 167 Crores is compared to that of other backward communities' budgeted amount of 4000 Crores. Urdu Times has lashed out on narrow-minded communal officers and proposed a 21 point list of measures that they should take up for a holistic approach to Minority welfare.



Ghulam Muhammed, Mumbai
ghulammuhammed3@gmail.com
www.ghulammuhammed.wordpress.com




PS. Times of India's Mohammed Wajihuddin did find time from his entanglements with liberal/fundamentalist ideological polemics and has belated turned his attention to the ongoing debate on the money matters that should matter most to Muslims at any moment in time. Report follows.


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Mumbai/Minority_dept_holding_on_to_funds/articleshow/3939598.cms



Minority dept holding on to funds

6 Jan 2009, 0519 hrs IST, Mohammed Wajihuddin, TNN




MUMBAI: An Urdu poet once described the dole thus: `Tammannaon mein uljhaya gaya hoon/ Khilone de ke bahlaya gaya hoon' (I have been lured by promises/I have been fooled by toys). The couplet aptly describes the minority welfare department set up by former chief minister Vilasrao Deshmukh. Under intense pressure to stem the alienation of the minorities, especially Muslims who are around 13% of the population in Maharashtra, Deshmukh founded the minority department on February 21, 2007, with a handsome fund of Rs 167 crore at its disposal. Shockingly, almost one year after the department's inception, its investment has been zero. Deshmukh launched the department with much fanfare and a plethora of promises ― it was to be a nodal agency that would approve and implement schemes to help arrest the numerous ills facing the minorities. Scholarships to poor and deserving students, girls' hostels in Muslim-dominated districts, and strengthening the Maulana Azad Financial Corporation,
Urdu Academy and Minority Commission were some of the plans. All of them today remain on paper, thanks to the lackadaisical attitude of bureaucrats and politicians who refused to take the department seriously. "It's unfortunate but true that not a single paisa from the Rs 176 core has been spent. It shows that officials are not sincere when it comes to clearing files concerning the minorities,'' alleges Naseem Siddiqui, chairman, State Minority Commission. His deputy Abraham Mathai is equally critical, alleging that certain officers deliberately delayed the files and stonewalled the schemes. T F Thakekra, principal secretary, minority department, told TOI, "Since schemes were not approved, the funds remained unspent.'' She refused to elaborate on the reason why the schemes remained unapproved and hung up on this reporter. That the Vilasrao Deshmukh government had treated the minority welfare department as just another tool to assuage the frayed feelings of the minorities was clear from Day One. Without developing a proper infrastructure, Deshmukh integrated several wings of the government like the Urdu Academy, the Minority Commission and the controversy-riddled Waqf Board into it. "Even in the central government, the development of Urdu comes under the HRD ministry. But here it became a minority subject, and the government reiterated the stereotype when it treated Urdu as a language of Muslims alone,'' says Abdus Sattar Dalvi, the Urdu Academy's executive chairman. The government was also criticised when it set up a study group, headed by Mehmoodur Rahman, chief of Bombay Mercantile Bank, to recommend remedies for Muslim backwardness in the state. The committee was seen as a diversionary tactic since the Sachar Committee had already identified the reasons for Muslim backwardness and had also suggested several remedies.
Interestingly, the Mehmoodur Rahman Committee submitted its second and final report only on Monday and a six-member sub-committee, headed by minority affairs minister Anees Ahmed, has been set up to study it. "I have just been appointed minister for minority affairs. On Monday, we had a three-hour meeting. We hope that the schemes will be fast-tracked and money spent before March 31, 2009,'' Ahmed told TOI. That's what we call hoping beyond hope.





Click here
to comment on this story.


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?