Wednesday, September 13, 2006
Apropos Vidya Subrahmaniam’s article: ‘Elect not select’ (10/1/1997)
Friday, January 10, 1997
Apropos Vidya Subrahmaniam’s article: ‘Elect not select’ (10/1).
Both Kesari and Pawar represent two separate and distinct orientations to the future shape of Congress Party and its possible future Government.
Kesari is on record, for being bold and committed to the cause of upliftment of poor and underprivileged. If allowed to rule effectively, is easily capable of major initiatives to align Congress with common people and bring back old flavor of Congress commitment to the masses rather than the classes.
Pawar represents brute power; power solely for the sake of power. He revels in power games and has no genuine receptivity to any populist compulsions. His tenor of governance will be elitist and the gap between the haves and have-nots is bound to widen, creating further social turmoil.
#186
Apropos Vidya Subrahmaniam’s article: ‘Elect not select’ (10/1).
Both Kesari and Pawar represent two separate and distinct orientations to the future shape of Congress Party and its possible future Government.
Kesari is on record, for being bold and committed to the cause of upliftment of poor and underprivileged. If allowed to rule effectively, is easily capable of major initiatives to align Congress with common people and bring back old flavor of Congress commitment to the masses rather than the classes.
Pawar represents brute power; power solely for the sake of power. He revels in power games and has no genuine receptivity to any populist compulsions. His tenor of governance will be elitist and the gap between the haves and have-nots is bound to widen, creating further social turmoil.
#186
